Monday, June 7, 2021

Reading an Erudite Mystery Novel

I recently recommended The Rule of Four by Ian Caldwell and Dustin Thomason to our friends. I'd read that book ages and ages ago and knew it was a mystery, knew I really liked it and passed it on to my brother who liked it too. But I couldn't remember the story.

So despite the fact that I don't read regular books anymore, I decided to read it again. (I did just get new reading glasses.)

There are TONS and TONS of glowing reviews for this book and the words often used to describe it are intellectual, cerebral, brilliant, suspenseful but more often, it's erudite

Here is a little synopsis from Publishers Weekly:

"...Caldwell and Thomason's intriguing intellectual suspense novel stars four brainy roommates at Princeton, two of whom have links to a mysterious 15th-century manuscript, the Hypnerotomachia Poliphili . This rare text (a real book) contains embedded codes revealing the location of a buried Roman treasure. Comparisons to The Da Vinci Code are inevitable, but Caldwell and Thomason's book is the more cerebral—and better written—of the two: think Dan Brown by way of Donna Tartt and Umberto Eco..."
 Hmmm... cerebral. Yes, it's definitely that. It's not a book you can skim. The sentences are so eruditely structured that you have to read some twice to get the full appreciation.

And here's part of another book review from Book Browse:
"...Ten years ago, Ian Caldwell and Dustin Thomason's The Rule of Four became a literary phenomenon that earned comparisons to Umberto Eco's The Name of the Rose and Donna Tartt's The Secret History. Hailed as "ingenious...profoundly erudite" (The New York Times), "compulsively readable" (People), and "an exceptional piece of scholarship" (San Francisco Chronicle), it spent forty-nine weeks on the New York Times bestseller list, sold nearly two million copies in North America, and was translated into thirty-five languages around the world..."
The thing is, once I started rereading The Rule of Four, I quickly got hooked. 

And you can't read this book really fast. And you can't skip portions because you don't know where there will be a clue.

The authors are Princeton and Harvard graduates. They're obviously brilliant and obviously very erudite which you will immediately surmise once you start reading.

Warner Bros. bought the film rights to it a while ago, but haven't worked on it yet. They must be looking for some erudite screenwriters. 

My aging non-erudite brain is also having trouble remembering so I was flipping back here and there to reread some portions. This was actually easier for me to do on a real book.

I have now borrowed Ian Caldwell's The Fifth Gospel on my Kindle. I may not be erudite, but I can read slowly.

POSTSCRIPT:
I started The Fifth Gospel and think it's easier to read. Maybe. Then I read that Book Browse review again.
"...At once a riveting literary thriller, a feast of biblical history and scholarship, and a moving family drama, The Fifth Gospel is a novel about the depths of sacrifice and the power of forgiveness. Rich, authentic, erudite, 🙄 and emotionally searing, it satisfies on every level..."

20 comments:

  1. I seldom re read a book myself. But every once in awhile there is one I really like and I will re-read it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I read to my children when they were small. I would finish one book and my son would immediately say read it again. My daughter would immediately hand me another book from a huge stack and say now this one. My husband was a prodigious reader who read his favorites again and again and seemed to remember everything he read. I have gotten halfway through a book before realizing I read it before. Just funny how reading habits can be so different.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Got to admit I can do without erudite prose. Though if you are stuck with such, a hard copy is best for flipping back and forth. That is the only drawback to a Kindle. Impressed that you are jumping right back into the fire with another of his books. Pretty soon you will be able to change your blog title to Erudite Musings:))

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sounds intriguing, and I might give it a try this summer, altho' I'm not sure I'm erudite enough to appreciate it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Your deliberate, repetitive use of that word got me giggling. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like those kind of reads although I have to be able to concentrate to enjoy them. Right now with baby in the house, I'm too tired!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Alright Kay, this is WAY over my head. Had to look up the definition of erudite: "having or showing great knowledge or learning." Is it rude to be erudite?.... I guess not. At least you're still a very good teacher; inspiring folks to look up the definition!
    If I have to reread a line to figure out what was said, I wouldn't find that very relaxing to read. Reminds me of trying to understand stuff from old nursing textbooks.
    I'll just read your book review instead. thanks for the lesson. Linda in Kansas

    ReplyDelete
  8. reading a book for pleasure is not on my list. though i read a lot...online! Guess I'm not erudite! lol...

    ReplyDelete
  9. I very rarely read a book a second time especially if it is a mystery. Glad you and your brother enjoyed it. If you read it a long time ago, I could see why you wouldn't remember the entire story. Glad you loved it both times!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. OK, I will have to try them.

    ReplyDelete
  11. What a great book!
    Sounds too "heavy" for me, but it makes me wonder and I will find it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm not sure if this is a book recommendation or an exercise in sarcasm, but knowing you just enough, I doubt it is sarcasm, but indeed well done humor. And perhaps a book to put on my list. My erudition cells seem to be shrinking, however, so that might be troublesome.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I also looked up the meaning of erudite, to be sure I remembered correctly. Since I haven't read either book, I think I'll start with the first one! Thanks, Kay. I re-read books quite often myself. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thanks for this Kay, it sounds very good.

    All the best Jan

    ReplyDelete
  15. I had to look up the definition of erudite, lol. Not sure if I can handle that kind of book.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Erudite was one of my vocabulary words in the tenth grade. It's actually a word I use from time to time.

    ReplyDelete

I really LOVE hearing from you! However, if you sign in as ANONYMOUS, please don't forget to tell me who you are in the comment box by just writing your first name. We would all appreciate it if you kept your comment respectful and kind.

I’m using Comment Moderation for any post that is more than a day old because of aggravating SPAM. Therefore, if your comment does not go up on an older (more than a day old) post, it's because I need to OK it first. I'm sorry to have to do this, but again... sigh... it's the spam that's driving me crazy.